tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4742385127651266632.post460098909988516055..comments2024-01-07T12:13:21.793+00:00Comments on Craig Dearden-Phillips: Shifting ValuesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4742385127651266632.post-20000723517261465812010-06-01T23:51:17.845+01:002010-06-01T23:51:17.845+01:00I'm disappointed by it. Seriously disappointe...I'm disappointed by it. Seriously disappointed. (1) Why are the Telegraph not being slated for picking their moment so maliciously? Having this info and controlling it's realease is a flagrant example of the media believing it is more important than the story; and (2) why is the issue about homosexuality not being more openly discussed. There's a seeming 'colour blindness' about the responses that, as I say, disappoints. One of my in-laws - and how long until that becomes a comedy euphemism on Have I Got News For You? - inadvertently summed it up "I don't see what he was worried about, no-one cares anymore, do they?" Well clearly in David Laws' mind they do, sufficient for him to risk so much for what to him is (financially) so little . The question we should be asking is why does anyone feel a need to fabricate a story to cover the tracks of their sexuality in 2010? "I don't even see the colour of someone's skin" just doesn;t cut it in considering race, and the gay equivalent is simply an unsatisfctory level of analysis. David Laws didn't need the money, so what was really going on in his head? I don't know, but I suggest it was far more important for us to consider than the newly prized public pound.Rob Fountainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08839063117980699390noreply@blogger.com